Justice G. R. Swaminathan's order is a historic judgment in the field of justice. Political parties have no right to criticize this.

 

 

Are the judges to judge every political party in favour? Or the judiciary? Why the judiciary and the press in the country today? When you criticize politics, how can you criticize the honesty of others when your governance and power are in jeopardy? Will you criticize the judges when corruption and rowdyism are ruling the country?

Do you have the right to criticise the judges? Moreover, neither the DMK government nor their party nor their allies have any right to criticise a government, a fair judgment and a verdict given in accordance with the law.

Before you criticize someone, what is your qualifications? What is your quality? What is your honesty? What is your morality? What is your political management skills?

The DMK and its allies do not deserve it. Those who know politics know this. Those who don't know don't know. But it has to have a meaning.

You can't talk to people who don't know politics. Whatever you say, you have to talk to someone who can nod your head. Whatever you say, he doesn't understand.

Also, examine the historical facts of the Thiruparankundram temple. One should not talk about it without reading its facts, historical inscriptions and archaeological studies. But they are criticizing the judge's verdict as if they are speaking on political party platforms.

Also, fools who don't read all this can talk anyway. Anyway, it is a skill to speak to an uneducated person who doesn't know politics. Educated people will ask questions. Can they answer that question?

"The judgment delivered by Justice G R Swaminathan today is a judgment given under the law, not a judgment given to a particular religion. You can even go to the Supreme Court. You can go anywhere you want. Everywhere they are going to prove the history of the temple, the research of the archaeology department, the study of the inscriptions, all these are going to be proved with evidence.

Also, how did this dargah come to be in between? This is a fact known to the people of the country after 1947. In such a situation, the DMK is making a big mistake against Hindus and Hindu temples.

That too according to the judicial verdict, you have to light the lamp where you want to light it. But it is politically motivated to choose a place and put it there.

Puthiya Tamizhagam Party leader Krishnaswamy has said that the appeal should be made by the person who is the opposite party in this case. This means that only Muslims are eligible to appeal this case.

But they are appealing on behalf of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department. Is this the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department? Or is it the charity against Hindu temples? People will definitely give a befitting reply to the DMK in the 2026 elections.