Supreme Court judge Justice B.R. Gavai's opinion is against Sanatan.


Those who are against democracy in the country are in favour of it and those who oppose it are criticizing it. Opposition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, have voiced their support for it. But the Hindutva outfits have been criticised by the Chief Justice of India. R. They are raising their voices against Kavai.

Moreover, this problem will not arise if the judges in the country respect the law and speak according to the law and according to their conscience, rather than giving their opinions.

Besides, when they stand behind political parties, behind those in power, and deliver justice, the balance will come down. besides

The judiciary is under the direct eye of God, where whoever does wrong, even if the law does not punish them, that is, the angel of justice, punishes them as the law of God. Judges who make mistakes do so that they can experience it. But it doesn't look out.

Does God exist or not? If you look at him (God) as a stone or a statue, you will not see God there. Look at that stone and the idol as God, God will be there, that is the Sanatana Dharma.

Supreme Court Justice B.R. Rather than saying that Gavai's remarks are against Sanatan, it hurts the sentiments and religious sentiments of the people.

Also, what word did he use in the case related to the recovery of a Vishnu idol in Madhya Pradesh? If so, this is a purely advertising case. Not only did he dismiss the petition, but now ask God to do something.

You say that you are an ardent devotee of Vishnu. So, go and pray right now." At that time, advocate Rakesh Kishore tried to remove his colony and throw it at the judge. It is that he has fallen before him. The lawyer was immediately arrested and the police started interrogation.

The Chief Justice of India is hearing a number of other cases. This is an arrogant statement. Also, the deities are worshipped in the form of idols. It is wrong to hurt their religious sentiments.

Also, the fact that he is a judge of the Supreme Court is a high responsibility that hurts the religious sentiments of 100 crore people. Is he fit to be the Chief Justice? Is that the question of the people of the country? besides

People's faith and religious beliefs should not be ignored. Each of them had their own religion. What you should have done was that you dismissed the petition and went with it, there would have been no problem.

But you are a devotee of Vishnu, go and ask him. He will make the statue. This is a consequence of mockering the deity, and even if you are a great judge, you will be punished with the same punishment of God. There is no alternative opinion in that.

He also says that he opposes Stalin Sanatan for the sake of politics. He who opposes Sanadhana, why do they worship the Lord at home? Prime Minister Narendra Modi has also condemned the move. Has he also condemned politics?

But the judge's opinion was disgusting. No one will punish him. Because! That's why the Chief Justice took it in his hand and threw the slippers away? Advocate Rakesh Kishore replied that he did not know what happened to him at the scene.

I don't care if my family accuses me of this. So, even if I go to jail, I don't care about it," he said. If so! This shows how great a pious man he was. Therefore, judges should not be responsible for this conflict of opinion among the people of the country. besides

Politics is different, religion is different, law is different, people's religious beliefs are different. The Chief Justice should have understood this and spoke. But it is condemnable to say that we are in a high position.

Similarly, people like Thirumavalavan, Vaiko, etc., who are against Sanathanam, are talking about politics anyway. It's a talk to fools who don't know politics.

How can a judge speak ill of people's religious beliefs and religious sentiments? India will not tolerate lawyer Rajesh Kishor insulting Sanatan Dharma," he told the judge.

Popular posts
Tamil Nadu Government Journalists Identity Card? Or circulation ID card of magazines? Can you give a proper explanation for this? - Press Officers.
படம்
சிவவாக்கிய சித்தரின்! ஆன்மீக கொள்கை, செயல்பாடுகள் பற்றிய உண்மைகள் .
படம்
பறையர் இன மக்களுக்கு தங்கள் வரலாறு தெரியாமல், ஆளுக்கு ஒரு கருத்து பேசுகிறார்கள் . இதுபற்றிய கடந்தகால வரலாற்று உண்மைகள் என்ன?
படம்
நாட்டில் அரசியல் கட்சிகள் பரிந்துரையில் ,தகுதியற்ற நீதிபதிகள் நியமனம்! இன்று நீதித்துறையில் ,நீதியை நிலை நாட்ட முடியாமல், வழக்கறிஞர்கள் போராடும் அவல நிலையா?
படம்
கரூர் விவகாரத்தில் உச்சநீதிமன்றம் சிபிஐ விசாரணைக்கு உத்தரவிட்ட நிலையில்! திமுக ஏன் பதறுகிறது? - எதிர்க்கட்சித் தலைவர் அதிமுக பழனிசாமி ?
படம்