Judge appointments in the country should be transparent. The choice should be non-partisan. He should not be appointed as a judge just because he has won party-related cases.
How many cases have been fought for the welfare of the people? How many public interest litigations? How many legal trouble cases? How many cases are there for social justice struggle? What are the issues on which such a lawyer has argued in his life?
How many cases has he fought and won on important issues such as the impact of society, personal harm, the impact of the government, the nation, the atrocities of political parties, the protection of the law, etc.?
How many such cases? Has a lawyer succeeded? How is justice established? On this basis, a lawyer should be selected as a judge. Only then can the judiciary function as a judiciary.
Today, the judiciary sits as a judge on the recommendation of political parties and when they dispense justice, do they act as agents of political parties? A doubt has arisen in the minds of the people of the country.
This is because the lawyers who have studied law in the Supreme Court and the High Court, even if they face cases as per the law, are not able to succeed and are only disappointed in those cases.
The reason for this is that if the judges forget that everyone is equal before the law and the judiciary is for the people, and the background of the rulers and the political parties, will there be any indirect benefit to them? Do they make such judgments for that gain? This has raised doubts in the minds of the people of the country.
This kind of justice is against the people of the country. Moreover, these judgments are being criticized by the public. It is brought up as criticism in the field of journalism. If the criticism is in favour of the political party, the newspapers and television channels celebrate and praise it.
The neutral press criticizes it. The same is true of journalism. Apart from this, the issue of lawyer Rakesh Kishor, who has now thrown a slipper at Chief Justice of India B R Gavai, is being talked about all over the country.
How should a judge rule? He should judge in a neutral mindset. If he is against one religion and in favour of another, how can his verdict be accepted?
Moreover, the basic purpose of each of the judgments is not impartial, which has created fear among the people. Besides, if advocate Rakesh Kishor was wrong in throwing slippers, then Chief Justice of India P.R. What Kavai said was wrong. You are a devotee of Vishnu and ask him.
Yes! He said a word. He told me to take off my slippers and hit them. Even if it is wrong in the law for him to throw the slipper, it is also wrong according to the law that the judge spoke while delivering the verdict. It is wrong to blame only the lawyer in this matter, and the judge's opinion is also wrong.
The first mistake was made by Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, who said that there should be no place for this job and that is justice.
If you give verdicts to those who want them, to the political parties and to the people of the rulers, then the people of the country will lose faith in the judiciary. Also, the judiciary!
Every judge should realise that it is the trust of the last people of the country and uphold justice. The consequence of wrong judgments has been the struggles in the society and it has also encouraged anti-national forces. This is a danger to the country and the nation.
The DMK government has retained Senthil Balaji as a minister without portfolio for more than a year in connection with corruption cases in Tamil Nadu. Governor R.N. Ravi protests. The judiciary should have taken over his ministerial post by then. He didn't do that either. They are bailing him out.
He has now filed a petition in the Supreme Court as a minister. What does the judiciary say about that? If so, we have no objection to him serving as a minister. But he should not exhaust the use of authority for witnesses. If something like that happens, we will cancel the bail. Why are you propping up Senthil Balaji by bringing so many things? A corrupt minister is apparent.
But the work of propping it up, the work done by the judges, is a disturbing thing to the judiciary. That's what many judges in the judiciary are doing today, and there are a lot of reports about it.
New Delhi: A bundle of cash was set ablaze at the residence of a judge of the Delhi High Court.
They also put an interim stay on the amendment to the Waffe Act brought by the central government in Parliament. They have banned the law without knowing the essence and truth of the law.
Besides, there are reports that even the land that belongs to the army today is called Waff place. Judges should have thought about how much property has been defrauded in the country by using this law.
Such is the judiciary! It is very painful that the integrity of the judges in dispensing justice has become a question mark and a talking point among the people.
It is the demand of every Indian that a committee should be set up under the chairmanship of the President to examine the list of judges who are causing disturbance to the judiciary.
What is the fairness of the judges' verdict? The committee should inform the people of the country. Only then can the judiciary be corrected.
