The entry of politics into the judiciary, the appointment of judges by politicians, the appointment of judges by the rulers, is a blot on the judiciary. The judiciary should be transparent. It must act on the sole idea that it should be justice only for the people.
Moreover, the faith of 140 crore Indians and the Constitution of India should not be compromised. If so! Politics in the country will be honest. Corrupt people will not be in politics. You can't do fake politics. Politics will be in the public interest.
Similarly, in the field of journalism, if the newspapers that prop up the corrupt are given concessional advertisements in the country, it will encourage corruption and corrupt people.
Political parties, newspapers, business newspapers and TV channels are wasting crores of people's tax money on all these things.
How wrong are the laws of the central and state governments? Not only that, when he met Raja Raman, secretary of the information department, at the secretariat yesterday and posed questions about the press, he said, "You should submit an application."
We will see the news in the newspaper and then put it on. That too a news secretary from Tamil Nadu, why are we putting the news in the newspaper? Without even knowing it, he says, we will read it and put it on.
So far, a number of applications have been submitted to the news department on behalf of People's Power and the Tamil Nadu Social Welfare Journalists Federation. Not only that, a lawyer notice has also been issued.
What did they do about it? Our question is, what action are they going to take now?
Moreover, the press has entered politics. Is that why it has been made legal for those who work in a corporate newspaper to decide which newspaper is which?
What is a magazine? You have to tell all this to someone who doesn't know. Those who are not qualified to tell a story on their own, who work according to what the employer says, and who are not qualified to judge the quality of a newspaper for another newspaper? besides
Is it selfish to give important responsibilities to the Journalists Welfare Board (JWB) for political parties, who can run newspapers, run television channels and work in it? Public welfare? Also, they,
Which newspapers can you give advertisements to? Do they decide? From the government identity card to the members of the Journalists' Welfare Board, how can this be accepted?
Is the Journalists Welfare Board being used to politicise the people you want, the newspapers you want? None of this is properly, systematically, legally and conscientiously functioning in the news industry.
Those who are loyal to your party, loyal to the government, the press department is working for them. This is what journalism has come into politics. This can only be rectified by law. Only the judiciary can come up with a proper solution.
Until then, there will be no benefit to the social welfare press and journalists in the country. Politics has become selfish and no matter how many applications, complaints and messages are posted there, no work will be done. For you and for your dependents, politics means that the country and the people of the country do not need such selfish politics.
How can the DMK government meet the demands of the people when it can't meet the demands of a newspaper? It's up to the people to think about it.
Moreover, the social media has not been able to convey many facts to the people. We are able to give as much of our labor as possible to the people. Therefore, our demand is something that has to be settled by law.
What is more important is that there are 234 MLAs in the country, 40 MPs and ministers, but not a single person speaks about it. What's going on in the country? This is a prime example of this.
Also, there should be a judiciary that is justice for the people. The judiciary should never exist for the rulers and political parties. You shouldn't judge them by looking at them in office. They should be seen as ordinary people when justice is spoken. Michael Cunha, who delivered the verdict against Jayalalithaa in Karnataka, is one of the most memorable judges in the history of the judiciary.
When he was in office as a Chief Minister, he was not afraid of the post and delivered justice. Now, two judges are staying away as they are afraid to deliver justice in the TASMARK scam case. All this is an insult to the judiciary. The judiciary needs to understand this.
The recommendation of political parties, the recommendation of the rulers, the appointment of a judge should never be made. The selection of judges should be based on their merit. If not!
Political chaos, dishonest governance, corruption and corrupt people will continue to rule the country. The judiciary will not punish them and expel them from politics.
Thus, the lives of the people of the country! Why doesn't the judiciary understand that there is a struggle every day?
Let the judiciary take a small survey today. According to the population before 1965, how much was the case in the courts?
At present, according to the population, how many cases are there in the courts? That's a prime example of this.
